Less than a week after Michael Jackson’s sudden death, multiple reports have surfaced claiming that Michael Jackson is not the biological father of any of his children. One report also states that ex-wife Debbie Rowe is also not the biological mother of the two of the singer’s children to which she gave birth.
According to a report in Us Weekly, multiple sources claim to the mag that Jackson’s dermatologist (and Debbie Rowe’s former boss), Arnold Klein, is the biological father to Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11.
“He is the dad,” a Jackson source claimed. “He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth.”
When contacted by Us Weekly, Klein would not comment.
According to a report by TMZ.com, the Jackson children’s biological family tree is actually even more of a mystery. The Web site claims that in addition to not fathering his two eldest children, that Jackson did not father his youngest, Prince Michael II, 7, either. TMZ also claims that Rowe is not biological mother of Prince Michael and Paris.
According to multiple TMZ sources, all three Jackson children, “were conceived in vitro — outside the womb,” using a sperm donor and that Rowe’s eggs were not used. The Web site claims she was used as a surrogate and paid well for carrying the children.
As for Prince Michael II, TMZ reported the surrogate that Jackson used was not told to whom the baby she was carrying would go. Three days after the baby was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, a lawyer for Jackson reportedly picked up the baby and delivered the newborn to the singer.
TMZ has also reported that it is not known if Jackson selected the donors himself or if he was unaware of whose sperm and egg was being used. The site goes on to claim that documents do exist outlining all of the arrangements surrounding the births of all three children.
Big deal. Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that Michael never had sex with anybody. Plus, Rowe’s already said that she’s not going to fight for custody of the kids, who’ve already been placed in care with Michael’s mom, Katherine. People need to leave Michael’s kids out of all the talk, gossip and drama–they’re innocent young’uns whose lives have already been in the spotlight enough. Besides, I’m way more concerned about the with the word going around about this personal “doctor” of Michael’s who may’ve contributed to his death.
[...] Original post [...]
I don’t care what the tabloids say about MJ’s oldest children…but ‘Blanket” is MJ’s child…can’t you see in in his face?!!
who cares as long as they are loved and cared for so what leave them alone and gossip about someone else they have enough to deal with. consider it an adoption it doesnt matter its not your problem!even if deals were made someone gave them a home and someone else got rich all in all looks like life shall go on. and now the dr.s who illegally gave him dangerous drugs and killed him so he cant raise them, will pay for taking a father away from his children and causing all the money grubbers and rats to come out of hiding to stir up chaos. people live your own lives and leave innocent children alone.!!!
biological doesn’t mean the fittest! you ever “CARED FOR” and “NUTURED” and “LOVED” those kids are their REAL PARENTS!
biologically speaking, people making hits and media attention to everything to keep their damn job, EVERYONE?! please let’s help the children move on and disregard what the media has to say about all this “uneccessary” bullcrap…. we love our celebrities, yes we do, but we do not have to add on to the “insecurities” their father had to endure! i hope michael is resting in peace, cuz it looks like hell had broken loose with all this CRAP!
I don´t think that Michael J is the biological father to his two eldest chldren Prince and Paris. However nothing in the world can free Michael to be the biological father to little Blanket because he really is Micheal´s “mini-me”.